Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Staff frames Flatirons Crossing as primary revenue engine; Center Street and Town Square obligations remain long-term commitments

February 08, 2025 | Broomfield County, Colorado


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Staff frames Flatirons Crossing as primary revenue engine; Center Street and Town Square obligations remain long-term commitments
BROOMFIELD, Colo. — At the focus session staff reviewed how large, negotiated development agreements affect long-term revenue and cautioned that converting commercial land to residential development can increase fiscal pressure on city services.

City and County Manager Jennifer Hoffman and other staff said several multi-decade development agreements require the city to share or pass through sales and property tax revenue to project partners; those agreements were negotiated to induce redevelopment but reduce the city’s net revenue share for the life of the agreements.

Nut graf: Staff emphasized that Flatirons Crossing (the mall redevelopment) is the dominant near-term commercial engine and that the revenue-sharing structure and obligations for Center Street and Brookfield Town Square are already in place. Staff said Flatirons’ long-term fiscal contribution makes it a critical revenue source even when other catalytic projects are presented as community amenities.

Staff described the policy trade-offs involved in developer negotiations: catalytic projects such as public space or amenities may not generate net fiscal gains, while projects tied to retained commercial square footage can materially support the general fund. In response to council questions, staff said the Flatirons agreement and other legacy deals reduced the city’s share of revenues for decades and that Flatirons remains the single most important revenue source.

Staff also discussed metro districts’ role in financing infrastructure and reminded council that many residential areas are served by metropolitan districts that carry debt and levies separate from the city’s revenues. Finally, staff noted that agreements come with timelines and that several of the large agreements in the north, center and south of the city run through the 2030s and 2040s, and there are limits on the city’s ability to change those terms absent new negotiations.

Ending: Staff asked council to weigh long-term revenue impacts, not only the immediate community benefits, when evaluating new land-use proposals and redevelopment incentives.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Colorado articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI