Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Committee considers overhaul of agricultural property classification and review process

February 07, 2025 | 2025 Legislature MT, Montana


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee considers overhaul of agricultural property classification and review process
Representative Esman opened the hearing on House Bill 27 and told the House Taxation Committee that the bill would generally revise eligibility for classification of property as agricultural for property valuation purposes. Esman said HB 27 was a recommendation from the Department of Revenue’s Land Classification Working Group and characterized it as a "simple cleanup bill."

Esman told the committee the working group included representatives from agriculture, development, and local and state government and that the group was tasked with establishing fair taxation of raw and undeveloped land. He said the group concluded statutory language should prioritize preferential classification for "bona fide" agricultural property and incentivize landowners to keep land in bona fide agricultural use.

Representative Esman summarized provisions included in the bill as described in the short title: an application process for agricultural property, a review process for properties classified as agricultural, revised income requirements for certain property to qualify as agricultural, removal of the "nonqualified agricultural property" classification, the creation of an "idle land" property classification and tax rate, and a realty-transfer requirement (text in committee summary truncated in the hearing record).

The sponsor described the measure as intended to correct statutory language and clarify legislative intent after the interim working group review. The committee did not record a vote during the opening; the hearing proceeded with instructions about testimony length and participation. No formal action or vote on HB 27 was taken in the portion of the hearing captured by the transcript.

Ending: The hearing on HB 27 was opened and initial sponsor remarks were heard; committee discussion and public testimony were scheduled to follow but are not included in the provided transcript excerpt.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Montana articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI