Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Senate resumes debate on making comptroller general an appointed post; sponsors carry joint resolution over

February 11, 2025 | Senate, Committees, Legislative, South Carolina


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Senate resumes debate on making comptroller general an appointed post; sponsors carry joint resolution over
The Senate returned to a joint resolution on Feb. 11 proposing a constitutional amendment to remove the Comptroller General as an elected officer and make the position appointed. Senator Khamsin led floor discussion and then supported a motion to carry the measure over to allow additional review.

Senator Khamsin said the resolution would "remove the controller general from an elected position to a position that is appointed," and traced the office’s history to explain the change. He described duties of the Comptroller General — preparing the state's comprehensive annual financial report, accounting for appropriations, maintaining financial information systems and serving on certain oversight boards — and argued the role is a professional financial function better suited to appointment.

Colleagues asked whether the treasurer’s office should be considered similarly; Khamsin said he was deferring to the special committee chaired by Senator Grooms, which has studied the treasurer’s office in more depth. Senator Devine and others raised the recent fiscal-accounting problems and noted an ongoing SEC inquiry; Devine said the SEC monitors how the legislature responds and that the body’s stewardship matters for that external review.

Senator Khamsin said he would not force a quick vote and would yield to the special committee’s work; Senator Grooms moved to carry the resolution over and the Senate agreed. No final popular-vote question was placed on the ballot during this session — the resolution was carried over rather than advanced to the 2/3 legislative vote and subsequent referendum step.

The transcript records extensive floor discussion about institutional checks and balances, the role of an auditor and how elected versus appointed structures affect accountability; senators also raised the possibility of asking separate questions to voters for other offices, which would require separate resolutions.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting