A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Council advances cannabis ordinance to next step; one councilmember objects to buffer absence

January 06, 2025 | Austin City, Mower County, Minnesota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Council advances cannabis ordinance to next step; one councilmember objects to buffer absence
Austin City Council moved forward on a proposed cannabis ordinance and advanced the measure for the next stage of consideration, but at least one council member objected to the current draft.

Council voted to direct staff to prepare the ordinance and then proceeded with the ordinance's first reading. During the first-reading vote, the councilmember at large, identified in the meeting transcript as "Council member at large Austin," voted no and said the ordinance should have included buffer requirements; the chair said the item will be carried forward to the next meeting.

Why it matters: Establishing a local cannabis ordinance sets the city’s local permitting and land‑use parameters for cannabis-related businesses. Council members raised procedural questions and differences about whether buffer zones around sensitive uses should be included in the ordinance's initial draft.

What council heard: A council member said they had missed prior discussions and did not see buffer language in the draft. Another council member confirmed the version before council was the original draft without the buffer parameters. After debate, council approved the motions to prepare and take up the ordinance for first reading; the first-reading vote included a single recorded “nay.” The transcript does not include text of the ordinance nor specific buffer distances.

Council action: The motion to prepare the ordinance passed and the ordinance was advanced at first reading with a recorded no vote from the council member at large. Council did not change the draft to add buffers at this meeting.

Next steps: The ordinance will return to a future meeting for further consideration; staff will follow the council’s direction to prepare the draft ordinance materials.

Ending: Council advanced the ordinance while noting at least one member preferred additional buffer language.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Minnesota articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI