Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Bill would require Commerce to recommend sustainable funding for Washington long-term care ombuds program

February 14, 2025 | Health & Long Term Care, Senate, Legislative Sessions, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Bill would require Commerce to recommend sustainable funding for Washington long-term care ombuds program
Senate Bill 5606, sponsored by Sen. Bateman, would create a process for the Department of Commerce to develop and submit funding recommendations to ensure the Long-Term Care Ombuds program has resources commensurate with the population it serves.

Nut graf: The long-term care ombuds program is a federally required, resident-advocacy program that investigates and resolves complaints for residents in licensed long-term care settings. Bill proponents said Commerce should produce a biennial funding recommendation—submitted to OFM and the Legislature by June 1 of even-numbered years—so budget writers can consider sufficiency and staffing that match population growth and service need.

Testimony highlights: Melanie Smith (Long-Term Care Ombuds program) told the committee the program sits outside state government budget processes and cannot automatically grow to match rising resident counts; she cited an Institute of Medicine guideline of one full-time ombuds per 2,000 residents and said Washington currently averages about one per 3,600 residents. Commerce legislative director Dave Pringle described collaborative work with the ombuds and noted Commerce had earlier developed funding-model options for the Legislature. Regional ombuds and Area Agency directors described volunteers and staffing strains and rising resident counts; Mike Reardon (Area Agency on Aging and Disabilities, SW Washington) described nearly 100% growth in volunteer hours in his region between 2020 and 2024 and increasing adult-family-home beds.

Why it matters: Supporters argued the bill would create a predictable, evidence-based recommendation process so that the program can meet federal obligations and maintain resident protections as demand grows.

Ending: The committee took public testimony and closed the hearing; no committee vote was recorded during the Feb. 14 session.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Washington articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI