Sponsor to broaden drone bill’s surveillance language after committee feedback
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
Representative Holly’s drone bill (HB 14‑29) prompted discussion about whether the measure should target surveillance generally rather than only remote pilot aircraft; the sponsor agreed to work with Legislative Counsel to consider broader language.
The committee discussed House Bill 14‑29, sponsored by Representative Holly, which in its draft text targets surveillance using remote pilot aircraft. Members urged the sponsor to consider broader language that would cover other surveillance tools.
Representative Freiberg argued the concern is about surveillance methodology, not only drones, and suggested the bill should cover “all the tools that are included, not just singling out a drone.” Representative Eric and Representative Anderson gave examples such as aircraft at higher altitudes, ground robots and even telescopes, saying similar privacy and property issues can arise without a drone.
Representative Holly said she would discuss revisions with Legislative Counsel (Victoria) and with Representative Schreiberbecht and others who had raised similar concerns. “I can go visit with Victoria and see where…we can hash out,” Holly said.
No amendments were adopted and no vote was taken; sponsors were directed to return with redrafted language if they choose to broaden the scope from “remote pilot aircraft” to other surveillance technologies.