Grant County commissioners approved multiple administrative and budget items during their regular meeting on Feb. 13, 2025. Most motions drew no substantive public debate and passed by voice vote.

Key approvals recorded in the meeting minutes included: expanding the fire protection grant fund by $278,816.10; purchasing a 2025 Peterbilt 4,000‑gallon water truck; approving a letter to join the County Livestock Loss Authority; and approving multiple county agreements and grant amendments. The board also approved several resolutions and retroactive intergovernmental agreements with state agencies.

The transcript shows motions, seconds and unanimous “Aye” votes for these items; specific roll-call tallies were not included in the material presented. Items approved (motion language summarized where the transcript used shorthand) include:

- Approval of the regular meeting agenda.
- Consent agenda: work session minutes (01/07/2025), regular meeting minutes (01/09/2025) and expenditure report ending 02/05/2025.
- Expand fire protection grant fund by $278,816.10.
- Purchase of a 2025 Peterbilt 4,000‑gallon water truck.
- Approval of letter to join the County Livestock Loss Authority.
- Agreement A-25-01 (details not specified in transcript).
- Mutual aid agreement A-25-02 for fire and rescue/EMS between Grant County and (transcript: “Seattle County” — text not further specified in minutes).
- Grant amendment 1 for project 25-ED-15.
- Retroactive approval of New Mexico Department of Health intergovernmental agreement for $192,500.
- Retroactive approval of an additional agreement for $150,000 (agreement text not specified in transcript excerpt).
- Standard subaward agreements A-25-06 and A-25-05 with the Center for Health Innovations (CHI).
- Amendment 1 to Resolution R-24-30 and Amendment 1 to Resolution R-24-32.
- Budget adjustment Resolution R-25-12.
- Resolutions R-25-13 and R-25-14.
- Resolution R-25-15 (supporting Tyrone Peak/Emma exploration by Freeport) — recorded separately in the meeting and covered in a dedicated item.

Where the transcript did not provide detailed agreement or contract text, the minutes record the motion, a second and an affirmative voice vote. The meeting record does not list individual commissioners’ yea/nay votes for these items in the excerpt provided.

Most approved items were administrative (agreements, grant amendments and equipment purchases); the meeting minutes show commissioners handled these with routine motions and majority voice votes.

For any item listed here in which the transcript excerpt omits substantive contract or grant language, the county clerk’s office maintains the complete agreement files and should be consulted for full terms and fiscal impact.