This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
Representative Kohler told the Government Operations Committee on Feb. 14 that House Bill 374 is intended to increase transparency by requiring the lieutenant governor to publish the names of people who signed certain certified petitions (including primary‑election signature filings) on the lieutenant governor's website for 90 days after certification.
Committee members questioned whether publishing a voter‑identification number alongside a signer’s name could create privacy risks or enable identification of voters who had requested protected status. Weber County Clerk Ricky Hatch urged transparency in signature‑gathering but cautioned that publishing voter‑identification numbers might allow someone with older voter lists to identify an at‑risk voter whose information should be withheld. Hatch said clerks preferred Senate Bill 164 (sponsor Rep. Cutler on the floor) as a vehicle for a broader set of audit and transparency reforms because it implements several legislative‑audit recommendations.
Representative Feffler moved to strip the words “voter identification number” from multiple lines in the bill; the amendment passed unanimously. The committee then voted to pass the bill favorably as amended. The final committee tally was recorded as 10 in favor and 2 opposed (Representatives Hayes and Romero recorded as opposed).
Marilyn Mominee and other public commenters supported transparency in signature reporting; supporters argued voters take a public act when signing a petition and that publication increases public confidence. Opponents cautioned about harassment risks when names are posted and asked for safeguards for at‑risk voters.
With the amendment removing voter‑identification numbers, Representative Kohler said he would consider further technical amendments on the floor; the bill now moves forward to the next stage with a committee recommendation.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,180 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles, watch selected videos, and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund in 30 days if not a fit