Committee backs changes to school-fee law, preserves no-fee core classes and adds transparency and no-fee pathway

2320220 · February 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Senate Education Committee passed a revised House Bill 344 that preserves non-fee core courses, permits fees for certain elective or advanced courses with prominent disclosure, and requires a no-fee path to graduation; the committee adopted an amendment addressing charter and AP-course edge cases.

The Senate Education Committee on Feb. 14 passed (unanimously) House Bill 344, legislation that refines school-fee rules after unintended consequences emerged from earlier 2024 changes.

Representative Strong, the sponsor, described HB 344 as restoring a practical balance between free, core instruction and fee-based co-curricular or elective offerings. Under the bill as amended, districts must keep “non-fee” core courses—language arts, mathematics, science, social studies and health—free of charges. Outside those core courses, schools may continue to charge fees for materials and special activities (for example, marching-band uniforms or specialized supplies), but course-registration materials must disclose fees prominently so families know costs up front.

The bill also requires each school to provide a no-fee path to graduation, meaning students can meet graduation requirements without paying optional fees by choosing alternate courses or fee-waiver options. The first-substitute amendment adopted in committee added a carve-out for certain charter or early-college programs that rely on AP or college-level courses where a district does not otherwise offer a fee-free equivalent: those schools may charge fees for college-level courses, testing or additional materials if no non-fee alternative is available.

Witnesses included charter representatives, teachers and a state-school-board member. Testimony acknowledged long-standing concerns about “pay to play” effects where fees can limit participation, particularly in communities with high fee-waiver rates. Representative Strong said there is one-time transitional funding in the prior session’s appropriations intended to help districts adjust as they implement the new rules; the sponsor noted that the State Board of Education had discussed extending the standard April 1 fee-deadline to allow districts more time to align fees with the amended law.

After discussion and public comment, the committee recorded a unanimous vote to recommend HB 344 as amended to the full Senate.