Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Committee gives HB1382 a due pass recommendation to add 3¢ fuel tax split to counties, cities, townships

February 17, 2025 | Appropriations, House of Representatives, Legislative, North Dakota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee gives HB1382 a due pass recommendation to add 3¢ fuel tax split to counties, cities, townships
Representative Craig Hedlund said House Bill 1382 would add 3 cents per gallon to the motor fuels tax, with the revenue distributed as one cent each to counties, cities and townships. Hedlund told the committee the payment would be distributed from the state treasurer and that committee language would use an existing distribution formula to allocate funds to townships.

Members praised the proposal as targeted support for local street, road and bridge work that local governments often lack the revenue to fund. Representative Pyle said the change is “key” for small towns that cannot raise sufficient local revenue for routine street repairs. Representative Wagner said the measure will help jurisdictions that cannot build to federal-aid standards and that local road projects can cost millions per mile.

Representative Richter asked whether public transportation or other uses would receive funds; Hedlund said the intent was to direct funds to political subdivisions rather than the state highway distribution fund and that the bill did not allocate an explicit share to public transportation.

Representative Brandenburg moved a motion for a due pass on HB1382, seconded by Representative Murphy. The committee took a recorded vote and recommended a due pass (13 yes, 7 no, 3 absent). The chair said the bill will return to the bill carrier for floor consideration.

Ending: Committee members asked staff to reconcile distribution language for non-oil producing counties and signaled the bill would progress to the next legislative step with requests for further technical review.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep North Dakota articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI