Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Committee hears resolution urging U.S. Supreme Court to restore marriage as union of one man and one woman

February 17, 2025 | 2025 Legislature NC, North Carolina


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee hears resolution urging U.S. Supreme Court to restore marriage as union of one man and one woman
Representative Bill Twythe (sponsor) told the committee HCR 3013 urges the U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider Obergefell v. Hodges and "restore marriage to a union between one man and one woman." He framed the resolution as an attempt to return marriage definitions to states and to the people.

Testimony in support included Arthur Schomper, field director for Mass Resistance, who argued the Obergefell ruling overstepped the Constitution and predicted consequences for religious liberty and public health; David Tamasia of the North Dakota Catholic Conference and Mark Grama of North Dakota Family Alliance Legislative Action also supported the resolution, invoking religious teachings and traditional-family arguments.

Supporters cited constitutional and historical arguments and said state-level action is appropriate. Representative Twythe framed the question in historical and religious terms and asked the committee for a "do pass" recommendation.

Opponents included Christina Sambor of the North Dakota Human Rights Coalition, who argued the resolution would harm lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender residents and would remove legal protections and tangible benefits, such as tax and inheritance rights. Sambor also challenged reliance on centuries-old texts as a basis for current civil-rights policy.

The committee heard additional public testimony both for and against the resolution, including brief floor readings and in-person and online witnesses. No committee action or vote was recorded at the hearing.

Ending: The committee closed the hearing after a full panel of supporters and opponents presented written and oral testimony; members had no recorded votes at that time.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep North Carolina articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI