Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Utah Senate advances Medicaid rate increases, tightens standing rules and creates homelessness-related property-loss fund; dozens of bills move forward

February 18, 2025 | 2025 Utah Legislature, Utah Legislature, Utah Legislative Branch, Utah


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Utah Senate advances Medicaid rate increases, tightens standing rules and creates homelessness-related property-loss fund; dozens of bills move forward
The Utah State Senate on Feb. 18 advanced a slate of bills spanning health-care reimbursement, civil procedure, homelessness relief and tax and local-impact policies, moving several measures to the third-reading calendar or passing them on the floor.

Senators voted to adopt a third substitute to Senate Bill 193, a measure to require annual Medicaid reimbursement rate increases tied to the state's general fund growth factor, and then advanced the substituted bill to third reading. Senator Derek Owens, sponsor of SB 193, said the bill “mandates an annual Medicaid reimbursement rate increase for health care providers, ensuring ongoing adjustments based on Utah's general fund growth factor,” and described an initial one-time appropriation of $15,000,000 to place specified provider categories on the new trajectory. The bill’s third substitute was recorded as having received 23 yea votes, 0 nay votes and 6 absent officials on the floor.

Senate Bill 203, sponsored by Senator Daniel Brammer, also moved forward after extended floor debate. Brammer described the measure as tightening rules for organizational standing in court: “What this bill does is it tightens up some of our rules with regards to standing to bring a lawsuit,” he said. Senators debated whether the bill would limit access to courts for associations; the sponsor said the measure preserves traditional individual standing while requiring associations to identify an injured member at the outset. The first substitute on SB 203 passed with a recorded vote of 19 yea, 6 nay, 4 absent.

Closely related, SB 204 (right-to-appeal amendments), also sponsored by Brammer, was advanced with similar debate about the appellate process for facial constitutional challenges; the first substitute passed on a 19–6–4 vote.

Senator Plumb's third substitute to Senate Bill 121, described by the sponsor as creating a “property-loss related to homelessness compensation enterprise fund,” provoked extended floor discussion about whether the state should serve as a backstop when private insurance or local governments already provide remedies. Plumb said the fund would establish a committee, allow mixed public and private contributions and create an application process to provide remedies such as no‑interest loans or grants in specific cases. The third substitute passed with a recorded vote of 15 yea, 7 nay, 7 absent.

Other bills the Senate advanced or passed included a property-tax revision bill (SB 202) that implements recommendations from a statewide audit of the property-tax system and imposes additional reporting and education requirements for county valuation officers; that first substitute passed on a 24–0–5 vote. The Senate also advanced family-court parent-time and custody amendments (second substitute SB 208) with clarifications on holidays and relocation rules; the floor recorded 23 yea, 0 nay, 6 absent for that item.

Shorter presentations or largely unanimous votes occurred on a range of other items during the day, including measures on abandoned-aircraft removal (first substitute SB 238, 21–0–8); law enforcement use and disclosure of artificial intelligence in reports (first substitute SB 180, 21–0–8); inland-port governance and project-area timing flexibility (first substitute SB 239, 23–0–6); and an organ-donor informational line addition (SB 229, 28–4–5). The Senate also approved a joint resolution authorizing Juab County prisoner placement (first substitute SJR 5, 25–0–4).

Votes at a glance

- First substitute Senate Bill 57 (newborn relinquishment amendments): 24 yea, 0 nay, 5 absent — read a third time.
- Third substitute Senate Bill 193 (Medicaid provider reimbursement amendments): 23 yea, 0 nay, 6 absent — substituted and read for third time.
- First substitute Senate Bill 238 (abandoned aircraft amendments): 21 yea, 0 nay, 8 absent — read for third time.
- First substitute Senate Bill 180 (law enforcement use of artificial intelligence): 21 yea, 0 nay, 8 absent — read for third time.
- First substitute Senate Bill 203 (judicial standing amendments): 19 yea, 6 nay, 4 absent — read for third time.
- First substitute Senate Bill 204 (right-to-appeal amendments): 19 yea, 6 nay, 4 absent — read for third time.
- Second substitute Senate Bill 208 (parent time and custody amendments): 23 yea, 0 nay, 6 absent — read for third time.
- Third substitute Senate Bill 121 (property-loss related to homelessness compensation enterprise fund): 15 yea, 7 nay, 7 absent — read for third time.
- First substitute Senate Bill 239 (inland port authority amendments): 23 yea, 0 nay, 6 absent — read for third time.
- Senate Bill 32 (class-size / targeted instructional funding, as amended): 21 yea, 2 nay, 6 absent — read for third time.
- First substitute Senate Bill 202 (property-tax revisions implementing audit recommendations): 24 yea, 0 nay, 5 absent — read for third time.
- First substitute Senate Joint Resolution 5 (Juab County prisoner placement): 25 yea, 0 nay, 4 absent — read for third time.
- First substitute Senate Bill 207 (local impact mitigation — oil/gas road mitigation): 22 yea, 3 nay, 4 absent — read for third time.
- Senate Bill 229 (organ donor informational line additions): 28 yea, 4 nay, 5 absent — read for third time.

Why it matters

- Budget and health-care planning: SB 193 creates a predictable, statutory mechanism to tie Medicaid provider rate increases to general fund growth and includes a one-time funding insertion intended to align multiple provider categories. Policymakers and providers said the change would reduce ad‑hoc rate requests and help agencies plan.

- Courts and civic groups: SB 203's new pleading standard for associations seeking to sue drew questions about access to courts and possible litigation over constitutionality; sponsors said the bill responds to recent judicial commentary and seeks clarity, not wholesale restriction of traditional individual standing.

- Community impacts of homelessness: SB 121 sets up a state-level structure to provide grants or low-interest loans to property owners affected by damage near homeless-service sites; proponents said it offers an additional remedy for recurring property damage, while opponents warned it could duplicate or supplant private insurance and concentrate state resources on local problems.

What the Senate did not decide today

Several substitute motions and committee-style adjustments were made on the floor; in some cases the floor approved substitutions and sent the bills back to the third‑reading calendar for formal enactment steps. A small number of measures were circled or temporarily substituted for committee or drafting work and will return to the floor on subsequent days.

Key quotes from the floor

- Senator Derek Owens, sponsor of SB 193: “This bill mandates an annual Medicaid reimbursement rate increase for health care providers, ensuring ongoing adjustments based on Utah's general fund growth factor.”

- Senator Daniel Brammer, sponsor of SB 203: “What this bill does is it tightens up some of our rules with regards to standing to bring a lawsuit.”

- Senator Jen Plumb, sponsor of SB 121: “It essentially creates a property-loss related to homelessness compensation enterprise fund.”

What’s next

Bills moved to third reading are eligible for final passage on subsequent floor days. Several measures passed with unanimous or near‑unanimous support, while others drew split votes indicating the prospect of further public debate or amendment as they move through the legislative calendar.

This roundup covers the substantive floor debate and recorded roll-call outcomes from the Feb. 18 Utah State Senate session.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Utah articles free in 2025

Excel Chiropractic
Excel Chiropractic
Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI