Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Committee hears support for requirement to teach textured hair in cosmetology programs

February 18, 2025 | State Government & Tribal Relations, House of Representatives, Legislative Sessions, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee hears support for requirement to teach textured hair in cosmetology programs
Cosmetologists, industry trainers and representatives from L'Oréal told the House Higher Education Committee on Feb. 18 they support House Bill 1874, which would require cosmetology and barbering programs to include instruction and practical demonstrations on textured hair.

Nut graf: Proponents told the committee that many cosmetology students currently graduate without experience working on a broad range of hair textures and that stronger, standardized curricular requirements would make graduates better able to serve diverse clients and improve job readiness.

Brooke Davies, representing Cosmetologists of Washington United, said the trade association supports HB 18 74 and asked to be “at the table” for implementation to ensure rural and apprenticeship programs can comply. Davies said the goal is meaningful curriculum that is not a “checked box.”

Intisar Benj, with McBride & Benj Public Affairs, and Sean Stearns, education lead for L'Oréal Professional Products, testified for L'Oréal in support of the bill. Stearns, a cosmetologist and educator, told the committee the curriculum changes “should not increase additional hours for cosmetology schools” because demonstrations already occur and the bill would ensure demonstrations and practice cover multiple hair textures.

Committee members asked about how widespread the training gap is and whether the bill would require extra time in school. Stearns replied the gap varies by school demographics and availability of clients during training; he said the adjustment is largely about diversifying demonstration and practice rather than adding hours.

Ending: Committee staff closed the public hearing on House Bill 18 74; no committee vote was recorded in the Feb. 18 transcript.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Washington articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI