Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Subcommittee presses for statewide protocol to track and prioritize domestic-violence arrest warrants

February 19, 2025 | 2025 Legislature CT, Connecticut


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Subcommittee presses for statewide protocol to track and prioritize domestic-violence arrest warrants
The subcommittee heard updates from the Division of Criminal Justice about changes to its case-management system to better capture and prioritize domestic-violence arrest warrants.

Gail Hardy said the case-management system will include entries for when a warrant is received, who reviewed it, the date it was forwarded to a judge, the judge’s response and when it was returned to police. The change is intended to create a single place to track warrants and follow up if service is delayed.

Law-enforcement speakers described different local practices. Captain Heather Larocque, commander of the patrol division in the Windsor Police Department, said domestic-violence warrants “are priority warrants” and that officers document attempts to serve them in the records-management system. Rob Rosado, chief of police in Meriden, said agencies vary but that most treat domestic-violence warrants with special care.

Andrea O’Connor, family-violence victim-advocate program manager for the Umbrella Center for Domestic Violence Services, said courts can be backed up and described a recent backlog in some courts. “The turnaround for signatures can be, you know, 1 to 2, maybe 3 weeks,” O’Connor said, adding that service in high-volume areas can take longer and that advocates lack access to warrant-status information.

Merit LaJoy, complaint officer at the Office of the Victim Advocate, argued for urgency: “I believe every domestic violence case should be considered a potential homicide,” LaJoy said, and said that domestic-violence warrants should be expedited rather than allowed to “sit.”

Speakers described internal processes for documenting service attempts; supplements and task assignments in records-management systems flag warrants for supervisors, but police reports of attempts do not automatically go to the court unless an arrest is made. Subcommittee members said the Division of Criminal Justice will continue to press partners for more uniform statewide practices and for processes that enable follow-up once a warrant is returned to the police.

Ending

The subcommittee recommended continued work with local agencies and the Division of Criminal Justice to reduce backlog, standardize tracking and explore options that would allow advocates or victims to receive status updates while protecting confidentiality.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Connecticut articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI