Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Senate committee backs resolution opposing national popular-vote compact, citing protection for small states

February 21, 2025 | State and Local Government, Senate, Legislative, North Dakota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Senate committee backs resolution opposing national popular-vote compact, citing protection for small states
The Senate State and Local Government Committee voted unanimously to support a concurrent resolution denouncing the national popular-vote interstate compact and urging other states to form an opposing compact.

Senator Jonathan Sickler (District 17), the resolution sponsor, told the committee that the interstate compact would require member states to direct their presidential electors to the national popular vote winner once compact states represent 270 electoral votes. "If the nation voted for candidate X and North Dakota voted for candidate Y, North Dakota, if it had joined the national popular-vote compact, would have to vote against how the state voters voted and vote for the national popular-vote winner," Sickler said.

Sickler argued the Electoral College protects smaller and rural states by ensuring national campaigns must reach a broad geographic cross-section of the country. Several committee members agreed. Senator Castaneda said the Electoral College gives North Dakota influence beyond its population size. Senator Wallen and others framed the issue as protecting states’ rights and called the resolution a statement in support of North Dakota's representation.

The committee recorded a do-pass motion on the resolution after a motion to "support" from Senator Lee, seconded by Senator Barta. The vote was unanimous; Senator Barta volunteered as the committee’s carrier on the resolution.

Ending: The resolution now proceeds with a committee carrier to the floor; sponsors said the measure is intended as a legislative statement urging other states to oppose the national popular-vote compact rather than as binding federal policy.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep North Dakota articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI