The State and Local Government Committee voted to amend a voter-approved term-limits measure to clarify how partial terms count. The committee adopted an amendment that would define the limit as "no more than four complete four-year terms" and指定 an effective date back to the original measure; the amendment passed unanimously in committee and the panel then gave the proposal a do-pass recommendation by a 5-1 vote.

Members discussed the treatment of partial terms, whether to count partial service (for example, appointment to fill a vacancy or a two-year subdistrict term) toward the limit, and whether the language should use an explicit time threshold (such as "more than half a term"). Senator Castaneda raised the idea of using a half-term threshold; committee members noted that the U.S. Constitution treats partial presidential terms with a half-term cutoff and that similar language could be considered but also adds drafting complexity.

Senator Rember and others said the change is intended to preserve the voters’ intent while addressing practical nuances created by midterm appointments and subdistricting. The committee adopted the clarifying amendment (roll-call 6-0 on the amendment) and then recorded a do-pass vote (5-1) on the revised proposal. Chair Roars and a majority of members supported the change; one member registered a no vote on the final motion.

Ending: The committee advanced the clarified term-limits language to the floor. Members noted that the question raises constitutional and statutory drafting issues that could require legal review before final enactment.