Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Proposal to shrink Montana Supreme Court fails after heated debate on caseload and costs

February 22, 2025 | 2025 Legislature MT, Montana


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Proposal to shrink Montana Supreme Court fails after heated debate on caseload and costs
Representative Schubert introduced House Bill 322 to reduce the number of associate justices on the Montana Supreme Court from seven to five, arguing the constitution names four justices and that other small states manage with five; he framed the change as an annual saving of about $1.2 million.

Opponents, including Representative Jay Fitzpatrick and several others, argued the bill would create a bottleneck, delay justice and undermine an efficient court system. Fitzpatrick recounted historical context and said the court currently manages caseloads by seating five-judge panels for routine cases and seven for controversial ones. Representative Frantz called the measure “arbitrary and capricious,” noting the state bar, trial lawyers, and chief justice had testified in opposition and warning of longer case backlogs.

Sponsor Schubert cited examples from other states — including New Hampshire — and said those courts efficiently handle appeals with five justices. He characterized the change as a fiscal decision and said legislators can use the saved funds for other priorities.

After debate, the clerk recorded 29 yes and 71 no; House Bill 322 failed second reading.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Montana articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI