The Open Space Committee reviewed an Eagle Scout project proposal and suggested alternatives and a process for approval that prioritize durability, trail usability, and coordination with town stewards.

The candidate’s written submission, as circulated to the committee, described a single bog bridge “12 feet long, 2 to 3 feet wide” on a swampy section of the Conesto Brook Trail (location described in committee documents as the section behind the chimney). Committee members said that scope is implementable but urged modern materials and a design allowing bike and emergency-ATV access where appropriate.

Committee guidance and project options
Committee members recommended several changes to improve longevity and reduce maintenance: shorter spans with multiple short girders, high-density polyethylene (HDPE) or FRP (fiber-reinforced polymer) decking on durable supports instead of untreated wood, and limited stone or short approaches on either end to channel flow. Members noted the maintenance burden of wood boardwalks and cited recent replacement work on other trails as evidence for using long‑lasting materials.

Committee members also proposed alternative or additional Eagle Scout projects: an interpretive trail with a series of small numbered signs (or QR codes) linked to online content or printed brochures, and a replanting or seedling-planting effort focused on riparian and pollinator species if seedlings are available. The committee discussed seedlings and a state program but noted that available stock was limited and that a formal forest-stewardship plan can affect program eligibility.

Process and scheduling
The committee asked that troop leaders and Eagle candidates approach the Open Space Committee early in their planning, so projects can be scoped and approved before significant volunteer effort. Members recommended inviting troop leaders (local Boy/Girl Scout contacts were identified) and contacting state forest staff for work proposed on or adjacent to state land. The candidate had indicated an early-summer timeframe for completion; the committee said field reconnaissance and research could fit within that schedule depending on final scope.

Speakers and roles
Bob (committee member; prepared draft response to the candidate)
Madeline (Eagle Scout candidate; Gardener troop representative referenced in meeting)
Jesse Bridal (Open Space Committee mentor/volunteer contact)
Tim Tarrant (forester; committee resource)
Mike Downey (external contact referenced for seedlings)

Clarifying details
- Candidate’s submitted specification: bog bridge described as 12 ft long and 2–3 ft wide (proposal text copied into meeting materials).
- Preferred alternative: shorter, robust spans (for example 4 ft deck panels supported on short HDPE or metal girders) to reduce need for heavy lifting and to improve longevity.
- Interpretive signs: committee recommended small numbered signs or QR codes linked to online interpretive content rather than large, wordy panels; signage should be installed after heavy construction to avoid damage.

Next steps
The committee will send a concise response to the Eagle Scout candidate outlining the preferred options, request early site visits with a committee member or forester, and invite troop leaders to coordinate logistics. If the proposed work affects state forest land or larger culverts/bridges, the committee said it will coordinate with state officials and obtain required permits or permissions.