Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Committee hears testimony to make sprinkler exemption permanent for small adult foster homes

March 11, 2025 | Human Services, Senate, Committees, Legislative, Oregon


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee hears testimony to make sprinkler exemption permanent for small adult foster homes
Senate Bill 1066 would permanently exempt adult foster homes and residential training homes from the state building code requirement that automatic sprinkler systems be installed in those facilities; the measure declares an emergency and would be effective on passage.

John Grimm, who identified himself as the owner of John Grimm Adult Foster Care, said he has operated adult foster homes for almost 20 years and that the houses provide a home-like environment. Grimm told the committee the cost of retrofitting sprinklers into an existing house can be high — “it was $20,000 just for my new house,” he said — and argued the state already requires measures such as showing all residents can evacuate within three minutes, maintaining smoke and carbon monoxide alarms, and documenting regular fire drills. “These are home-like environments. A sprinkler system to be put into an existing house is expensive,” Grimm said.

Rachel Hansen, testifying for SEIU Local 503, said the union represents adult foster home providers and supports the bill’s approach of preserving a home-like setting while prioritizing practical safety requirements. Hansen said providers generally care for residents who need help with daily living and that forcing sprinklers on homes that meet evacuation standards could cause closures of small, family-run providers.

Committee members noted the bill has a long history of temporary extensions. Chair Gelser Blue said stakeholders have repeatedly told the legislature a compromise was “almost done,” and the committee should decide whether to make the exemption permanent or continue using a sunset approach while negotiations finish.

No vote was taken; the committee closed the public hearing and will consider amendments and further testimony.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Oregon articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI