Committee favors pilot approach for park AEDs; concerns about theft and access raised

3056361 · April 19, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Committee members agreed on April 11 to explore a pilot AED approach at Norbert Park rather than installing permanent outdoor cabinets, citing theft and access concerns.

Narberth committee members debated whether to install permanent AED cabinets in Norbert Park during the April 11 meeting and expressed a preference for a staged, pilot approach that limits theft risk while preserving timely access.

Jeff Belden, who presented the staff memo on park AEDs, said theft and vandalism are the primary concerns about placing an expensive device on an exposed field or standalone pedestal. Chief John String and other committee members noted police and public works vehicles already carry AEDs, and the fire department and Burrell Hall maintain devices that can reach the park.

Committee members proposed several risk‑mitigation options: (1) using a mobile AED that recurring permit holders sign out during events, (2) locating an AED in an exterior but highly visible position near the parking lot or field‑house entry rather than on the athletic field, (3) storing an AED inside the field house and granting key‑fob or permit access to recurring league organizers, or (4) piloting a funded test in which recurring users contribute modest donations to buy a mobile unit.

A motion for immediate borough‑funded installation was not made. Instead staff was directed to explore a pilot: acquire a mobile AED for Norbert Park, work with recurring users (youth leagues, adult leagues) to test a check‑out or modest‑donation model, and evaluate theft and access issues over roughly a year before broader purchases. Committee members asked staff to report back on costs, storage logistics, training availability and possible camera placement to deter theft.

Ending: The committee agreed to pursue a pilot and further outreach to recurring users and “friends of” groups; no capital appropriation was approved at the meeting.