House adopts conference report strengthening penalties for illegal signal jammers when public-safety communications affected

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House adopted a conference committee report on Senate Bill 26 that adds a level-5 felony enhancement for using signal jammers to interfere with critical infrastructure or public-safety communications; several members complained that the conference process was too brief.

The Indiana House on April 21 adopted a conference committee report on Senate Bill 26 that increases penalties for certain signal-jammer offenses when the device is used to disrupt public-safety or critical-infrastructure communications.

Representative Ledbetter presented the report and said the conference committee returned language that makes the intentional manufacture, sale, marketing, possession or use of a signal jammer a felony; the adopted conference report includes a harsher penalty — a level 5 felony — if the jammer is used to disrupt a component of critical infrastructure or communications of a public-safety agency.

Representative Peter, speaking during floor discussion, clarified that the text presented was largely the House-passed language but with the Senate’s enhancement for attacks on public safety and critical infrastructure. Peter and other members raised concern about the speed of the conference committee process; one member said a recent conference committee lasted “about 13 seconds” and urged greater transparency and time for deliberation in conference committees.

The House adopted the conference report by recorded vote; the clerk announced 83 ayes, 8 nays and the conference report was adopted.

Details: Sponsors said the change targets malicious use of signal jammers that could interfere with emergency responders or critical infrastructure systems. Some members noted existing statutes covering critical-infrastructure mischief and said the conference report provides targeted specificity for jammer offenses.

The House will notify the Senate of the adopted conference report.