Speakers at the American Legion forum described last fall’s reimagining and redistricting process, said the district heard strong community opposition and reported that the board ultimately voted to maintain the existing school-organization model.

Nicholas Ciappetta said the board received public feedback and that in late October the administration recommended and the board accepted continuing the district’s current configuration (K–2, 3–5 and a sixth‑grade center). “I voted in favor of doctor Lea’s recommendation, and so that was my position at the time, it’s my position now that we continue to keep k to 2, 3 to 5, and 6 as it is,” Ciappetta said.

Other speakers described the process as a lesson in community engagement: several candidates and board members said the district underestimated how attached parents and residents were to the existing model and that a better outreach process or earlier transparency might have reduced controversy.

Panelists distinguished the two issues: reorganization (which is an internal district decision) and capital projects such as Vision 2020 (which requires a voter referendum). Nicholas Ciappetta and others said the reorganization proposal was rescinded after public input and that the district moved to alternate plans informed by surveys and focus groups.

Speakers emphasized that the disagreement did not signal broader dissatisfaction with district performance; instead, they framed it as a debate over process and communication. Several board members said they will pursue more community involvement earlier in planning stages for major changes.

The forum did not conduct a new board vote; speakers referenced the prior board decision to maintain the current school-organization model.