House approves bill recognizing other states’ handgun licenses for travelers in Texas

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House passed Senate Bill 706 to recognize out‑of‑state handgun licenses in Texas, a measure supporters said would let lawful travelers protect themselves while critics raised questions about cross‑jurisdictional safety and enforcement.

The Texas House voted to approve Senate Bill 706, a bill that authorizes recognition of handgun licenses issued by other states for visitors in Texas. Supporters said the change simplifies rules for travelers and increases personal protection; critics questioned whether it increases public risk or simply provides a courtesy to nonresidents.

Why it matters: SB 706 extends the practical ability of licensed carriers from other states to carry in Texas without a governor’s proclamation or negotiated agreement. Proponents described the measure as a reciprocity and traveler‑safety provision; opponents raised public‑safety hypotheticals in questions on the floor.

Key floor remarks: Rep. Isaac, explaining the bill, said the measure would “allow law‑abiding U.S. citizens of other states to be able to exercise their Second Amendment right here in Texas.” In a colloquy, Rep. Goodwin asked how the policy would distinguish law‑abiding travelers from someone who became violent while in Texas; the sponsor answered that licensed carriers are by definition law‑abiding citizens, and that criminal acts would still be prosecuted.

Vote and outcome: The House recorded the passage of SB 706. The clerk announced the tally: “For being 85 ayes, 15 nays, Senate Bill 706 has passed the third reading.”

Context and next steps: The bill aligns Texas with many other states that recognize out‑of‑state licenses and will require law enforcement and travelers to adjust to the uniformly recognized standard. Remaining questions include implementation and public‑education steps for visitors and enforcement guidance for local agencies.

Ending: Supporters framed the measure as enabling travelers' safety; opponents flagged enforcement and the possibility of misuse as grounds for continued scrutiny as the bill proceeds to final enrollment.