Commission discusses eliminating solid-waste project-manager line item to save $26,000, asks for follow-up

3862320 · June 17, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners discussed a proposal to remove the dedicated solid-waste project-manager position from the budget, transfer administrative tasks and have site attendants report directly to the commission; staff will return next week with statutory clarifications and implementation steps.

Commissioners discussed a staff proposal to eliminate the project-manager position in the solid-waste budget and transfer decision-making and administrative duties to existing staff and site attendants.

County staff described the position’s history and said the role was originally written in 2017 as a combined project-manager/planning-board secretary position. Following staff changes, the treasurer absorbed some administrative duties and a part-time clerk position was funded through the solid-waste budget. The project manager role now largely functions as a middleman between site attendants and the commission, staff said.

The proposal presented to commissioners would remove the project-manager salary line (roughly $26,000) from the solid-waste budget, have the commission take direct administrative oversight via site attendants and put day-to-day permitting or DEQ issues back to the appropriate staff. Commissioners asked whether permitting responsibilities (DEQ) or other statutory duties would shift to the treasurer or to the commission; county attorney and staff said they would research applicable statutes and return with a decision-ready item.

Ending: No motion was made; staff were asked to research statutory authority (including MCA 39-31-303 and related county-commission statutes referenced) and to bring the topic back for a formal action at a future meeting. Commissioners discussed potential savings and operational impacts and emphasized clarity about which department would retain DEQ permitting and reporting duties.