Council told staff working to revise member-service agreement to enable development south of ridgeline

5131181 · July 2, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff said they are negotiating language for a member service agreement with the wastewater agency to allow pioneering infrastructure that could advance development south of the ridgeline; the agency board recently met and approved new options for pioneering projects.

City staff told the City Council on July 1 that they are working with the regional sewer agency and developers to revise a member service agreement to allow pioneering infrastructure options intended to advance development south of the ridgeline.

Administrative staffer Miss Powers said city staff “continues to work with developers and the sewer agency to find solutions to advancing infrastructure south of the Bridal Line. And Papillion, we still need to approve our our member service agreement with the agency, so we're working on language to include in our agreement, that allows for pioneering infrastructure and allows development with that.”

Powers told the council the agency board met last week and “approved grama, and I'll make, these new types of pioneering options available.” Council discussion later noted that neighboring members Gretna and Springfield had differing policies at a recent wastewater agency meeting, which staff said they will factor into negotiations.

No final member service agreement was approved at the July 1 meeting; Powers said she expects the city to present a revised member service agreement within one to two months for council consideration. Councilmembers discussed that adopting a city-specific policy could open up sites that had previously been closed to development pending infrastructure financing and agreements with the sewer agency.

The city did not provide details on the specific reimbursement rules, dollar amounts, or the agency’s formal policy name beyond the language above; those details remain under negotiation.