Board members discussed establishing a standing committee on artificial intelligence and emerging technologies to advise the district on opportunities and risks, gather industry expertise and recommend classroom and policy approaches.

The proposer (identified in the meeting as a board member) said the first phase would focus on information gathering. Trustees Pete and Mike expressed interest in serving; the board discussed inviting external participants such as district administrators, technology staff and outside experts (examples given included Dr. D'Adraw, Chris Miller and Pam Chesser). Trustee Catalina said daytime meeting times work better for industry guests and noted scheduling constraints for some trustees.

Why it matters: trustees said AI is reshaping learning and district operations; a dedicated committee would allow the district to pilot an approach and assemble expert guidance without immediately committing to broad classroom changes.

Discussion vs. decision: trustees agreed in principle to form the committee and to begin with an information‑gathering phase; no formal charter, membership list or meeting schedule was approved at the meeting.

Quotes: “I always begin with the mission statement because it keeps us grounded... I, wanted to, get the board's thoughts on establishing an AI and emerging technology committee,” a board member said. Trustee Mike said, “When you look at it from a business standpoint, it's not taking over, but it's totally incorporated into most businesses now.”

Ending: trustees asked administration to return with a proposed scope, membership and meeting cadence; initial work will emphasize learning and limited time commitments.