Council adopts Safe Streets for All plan to target intersections and sidewalks, pursue grant funding

5387399 · June 12, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Spring Hill adopted a Safe Streets for All (SS4A) Comprehensive Safety Action Plan, prioritizing intersections and corridors (including portions of U.S. 169 and 190 First) for safety projects and laying out short-, mid- and long-term actions to pursue Vision Zero and implementation grants.

The Spring Hill City Council formally adopted the Safe Streets for All (SS4A) Comprehensive Safety Action Plan, a document staff and consultants described as a framework for reducing roadway fatalities and serious injuries and for pursuing federal discretionary grant funding.

The plan, prepared by HDR and presented by consultant Jay Aber, lays out a “safe systems” approach, maps of crashes and a prioritized project list that separates city, county and state-jurisdiction projects. Staff said the plan is roughly 80 pages plus appendices and reflects community engagement including in-person pop-ups, an open house, about 130 online survey responses and about 200 map pins. Consultants said the public repeatedly identified sidewalks and safety along U.S. 169 and intersections at 190 First, 200 & 15th, and 190 First & Ridgeview as priorities.

Adoption and next steps: Council adopted the plan to establish a framework to pursue implementation grants for seven priority project areas; staff said the adoption enables access to certain federal grant programs and that the city will next solicit letters of support and apply for implementation funding. The consultant recommended establishing a transportation safety board, pursuing a Vision Zero resolution, and producing an annual Vision Zero progress and implementation report.

Council discussion: council members asked whether the plan would lock the city into a rigid program; consultants and staff emphasized the plan is a guiding document and that priorities could change as annexations or development change conditions. Consultants also explained that traffic-safety analyses under Title 23, U.S. Code § 407 (23 USC 407) are protected from discovery and that adoption does not create discoverable liability for the city.

Why it matters: staff said the plan will help the city prioritize safety projects, strengthen grant applications, and provide guidance for sidewalks, roundabouts, traffic-calming and quick-build countermeasures.

Outcome: motion to adopt the SS4A Comprehensive Safety Action Plan passed 5-0-0.