Referendum fund posts surplus as district reports preliminary 24-25 expenditures

5426039 · July 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District staff told the Independent Citizens Referendum Oversight Committee on July 17 that preliminary accounting for the voter-approved 1-mill referendum shows revenues above budget and a higher-than-expected ending fund balance, with leftover dollars rolling forward and charter-school repayment included in this year’s expenditures.

Ms. Bostonellis, staff presenting the referendum financial report, told the Independent Citizens Referendum Oversight Committee on July 17 that the voter-approved 1-mill ad valorem referendum (effective July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2027) produced revenue above the district’s 24-25 budget and that unspent funds will roll to the next year. The report said the district has received roughly 102.19% of its budgeted referendum revenue for 24-25 and recorded expenditures of about 84.35% of budget through the preliminary close. “This is a little bit over what we have budgeted,” Bostonellis said, noting late tax payments and additional interest as common causes for variance. The nut graf: the committee was presented with a preliminary year-end picture showing higher-than-budgeted revenue, lower-than-budgeted spending in some line items, and a projected carryforward. That mix will shape decisions about program funding as the referendum continues through 2027. District figures presented at the meeting: beginning fund balance (carryforward from 23-24) $11.8 million; budgeted revenues for 24-25 approximately $38.1 million (actual reported); budgeted expenditures $43.3 million; actual expenditures reported around $36.6 million; projected June 30, 2025 estimated fund balance roughly $13.3 million (preliminary). The presentation also summarized multi-year receipts and expenditures since 2017 and noted that any unspent referendum dollars are restricted to referendum-eligible uses. Committee members asked how past obligations to charter schools were handled. Bostonellis said an earlier legal change and subsequent settlements resulted in a plan to pay charter schools; the report reflects that prior-year amounts due were included in the charter school expenditures shown to the committee. The presentation broke out budgets and spend rates by program: kindergarten paraprofessionals, physical education, vocational/CTE, library media, visual and performing arts, professional learning, and school safety. Several programs reported high rates of budget consumption (many in the 90%+ range), while some capital and safety projects were underspent for reasons explained elsewhere in the meeting. Ending/next steps: Bostonellis said these are preliminary numbers and the district expects to present finalized 24-25 accounting in the September quarterly report after the accounting close. The committee did not take a formal vote on any budget changes at the meeting; it accepted the quarterly report for review and follow-up.