Vice mayor says pension allocations underperformed; pension board tables action pending fuller review

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The vice mayor presented an analysis alleging private real-estate funds materially underperformed a REIT index alternative and asked the pension board to reconsider allocations; the item was tabled for a future meeting because town appointees were absent.

The council heard a presentation from the vice mayor highlighting that the town's pension portfolio allocation to private real-estate funds underperformed a low-cost REIT index alternative by a substantial margin, and the pension board tabled any town-level action until a fuller committee could consider the analysis.

"If instead of buying these funds, these private funds ... they had bought a Vanguard REIT index fund ... that portion of the portfolio would return 42.4% more," the vice mayor said, describing a six-and-a-half-year analysis of returns and fees. The presenter said the private funds charged a high expense ratio (about 1.1% of assets) and recommended shifting to lower-cost index alternatives.

The vice mayor said the analysis was compelling enough to recommend changing how the pension invests real-estate allocations, but noted only three people attended the recent pension-board meeting and the town appointees were absent. As a result, the board tabled the matter to allow wider participation at the next meeting.

The town attorney said council does not directly hire or fire fund managers; council can make comments or recommendations but ultimate investment management lies with the pension board's governance structure. The vice mayor indicated he would re-circulate his memorandum and requested staff and counsel review it for the pension board's next meeting.