Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

340B program draws competing testimony — hospitals seek protection while others call for transparency

July 15, 2025 | 2025 Legislature MA, Massachusetts


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

340B program draws competing testimony — hospitals seek protection while others call for transparency
Two bills related to the federal 340B drug-pricing program drew competing testimony at the Joint Committee on Health Care Financing: hospital and health-system witnesses urged protections to preserve the 340B program's benefits for safety-net providers, while industry and research witnesses asked for reporting and transparency to measure program impacts.

David Twitchell of Boston Medical Center Health System described 340B as a critical revenue source for safety-net systems: "In 2024, from MassHealth alone, our 340B benefit was nearly $70,000,000. Without it, we'd have a new $70,000,000 hole in our budget that we cannot tolerate," he said. BMC and other providers asked the committee to limit changes that would shift discounts away from safety-net providers and to preserve protections for hospital-affiliated pharmacies and programs that serve low-income patients.

Conversely, Kelly Ryan (pharma trade) and Robert Popovian (Pioneer Institute) supported S848, a transparency bill that would allow state agencies to study covered-entity 340B revenue and how those funds are used. Ryan cited Minnesota's review showing payments to third-party administrators and contract pharmacies can frequently consume a significant share of gross 340B revenue; Popovian said reporting is a prerequisite for data-driven policy decisions and noted growth and contract-pharmacy arrangements concentrated in affluent areas.

Why it matters: The 340B program is intended to support safety-net providers by enabling drug discounts; witnesses disagreed about whether program growth and contract-pharmacy practices are diverting benefits away from the intended providers.

Next steps: Advocates for transparency encouraged the committee to require reporting before additional legislative change; safety-net hospitals asked the committee to avoid statutory changes that would reduce their current 340B benefits without transition protections.

Ending: The committee heard data claims and counterclaims; no action was taken. Witnesses asked for analyses that clarify how 340B savings flow through providers and outside contractors so policymakers can evaluate reforms without undermining safety-net services.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Massachusetts articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI