Council discusses offer to buy small downtown lot; asks for formal offer and valuation

5464891 · July 23, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

An unsolicited $40,000 offer for a small city commercial lot prompted council questions about comparable valuations, access constraints and a recommendation to seek a written purchase offer or sealed bids and consider a formal appraisal before selling.

Council members discussed an unsolicited offer to purchase a small commercial lot the city purchased as part of a 48.05‑acre downtown assemblage in January 2020. Staff said the single commercial lot had originally been bought with Park City Land Bank funds for $72,842.71 and later transferred to the city. An individual offered $40,000 to buy the lot for commercial purposes; staff reported that local real estate agents provided an informal valuation range of $80,000 to $100,000.

Council members expressed concern about selling the parcel for less than the land bank purchase amount and raised several issues: the lot’s limited access and on‑site infrastructure constraints (a stormwater drainage easement in the southern half and a sewer line that divides the lot north‑south), the absence of a formal written purchase contract from the prospective buyer, and whether a sealed‑bid process or a formal appraisal would produce a better market outcome.

Several councilmembers suggested counteroffers or sealed bids rather than accepting $40,000; one councilmember proposed a counteroffer of $60,000. Staff said it could obtain a formal appraisal and that the council could require a written real estate purchase contract before any sale. City legal and staff advised the council that no action was required immediately and that they should not accept an offer without a formal contract.

Why it matters: The sale would liquidate a city asset purchased with public funds; council members said they want to protect taxpayer value and be accountable if selling below prior acquisition cost.

Next steps: Council directed staff to ask the prospective buyer for a written offer or purchase contract and to provide options—sealed bid, counteroffer, or formal appraisal—for council consideration at a future meeting.