Eleven bids opened for demolition at St. Louis Lambert International Airport

5471534 · July 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Board of Public Service opened bid letting 8798790 for demolition of multiple structures at St. Louis Lambert International Airport and read 11 bids from contractors; bid amounts and bidder names were recorded into the meeting record.

During the July 15 meeting the Board of Public Service opened bid letting number 8798790 for the demolition of the Missouri Air National Guard, JetLinks, and a credit union building at St. Louis Lambert International Airport and publicly read 11 bids.

The bid reading — entered into the official meeting record — included the following bidders and amounts as read aloud in the meeting: Total Wrecking and Environmental LLC, $1,718,956.44; Cosmey Wagner Incorporated, $1,880,033.01; Susan Shaffer, $2,174,592.00; Ben Hurr Construction Company, $2,175,000.02; C Rallo Contracting Company Inc. (read with unclear amount in the transcript); Sabre Demolition Corporation, $2,461,000.02; Dor and Associates Inc., $2,483,572.00; Renascence Inc., $2,636,143.00; Greens Demolition Contractors, $2,644,228.02; Groundworks Contracting Inc., $3,676,191.03; and NJW Corporation, $4,199,576.78.

Meeting audio transcribers and the bid reader made several brief verbal clarifications while reading the amounts; one bidder’s amount was unclear in the record and is identified below as transcribed. The board did not take an award decision during the public bid reading; this session recorded the bids for the procurement file.

Why it matters: The demolition project affects airport-owned parcels and is a publicly procured construction activity. The bids will be evaluated through the city’s procurement process before any contract is awarded.

Next steps: The procurement staff will review and tabulate the bids and return recommendations according to the city’s contracting procedures; the board did not vote to award a contract during the meeting.