Commission considers two second‑reading annexations; one 0.25‑acre parcel and a 73‑lot development

5551978 · June 25, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Two second‑reading ordinances would annex a 0.25‑acre property at Capps Road (to make a parcel contiguous) and a larger Hickory Ridge subdivision petition that would connect 73 single‑family septic lots to municipal water when annexed; commissioners debated septic use and timing but did not record a formal adoption vote at this meeting.

The City of Lake Wales commission held second readings on two annexation matters that would make property contiguous to the city and enable future municipal water service and planning oversight.

The first ordinance under second reading would annex 0.25 acres on Capps Road owned by the Lake Wales Country Club and make the adjacent property contiguous for a pending development. The second, also under second reading, relates to Hickory Ridge, a development proposed by Garden Street Communities that would create 73 single‑family lots served by septic and by municipal water connections where available; staff said the petition dates to 2021 and the project is nearing final plat.

City planning staff said both matters were negotiated previously and that annexation would allow the city to later assign future land‑use and zoning consistent with the city’s standards; the growth management representative noted that the subdivision was designed and approved under Polk County rules and that the city will revisit future land‑use and zoning after annexation.

Commissioners debated septic‑served lots and urban form. One commissioner said septic systems “perpetuate urban sprawl” and urged a preference for higher‑density, infill options such as attached units and common walls where feasible; other commissioners noted the subdivision already is largely built and that county approvals and existing infrastructure limit changes at this stage. Staff emphasized the time sensitivity: once lots are sold and individually owned, annexation becomes more difficult.

Ending: The ordinances were presented for second reading; staff will return with follow‑up materials on future land‑use and zoning assignments if the commission proceeds with annexation. The record at this meeting does not show a formal adoption vote.