Board approves 2025–26 property and casualty insurance after sharp premium rise

5668467 · July 18, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The school board approved a $1.4 million property and casualty insurance package for FY2025–26 after hearing that reinsurance market shifts, expanded abuse coverage and a multiyear workers’ compensation trend drove higher premiums.

The school district board on July 17 approved property and casualty insurance coverage for fiscal year 2025–26 at roughly $1.4 million after hearing from the district’s insurance agent that market changes pushed premiums up about 20%.

The agent, identified in the meeting as Mr. Gilmore, told the board insurers and reinsurers are increasing building limits and demanding higher premiums. He said insurers have recently treated abuse-and-molestation coverage as a separate line item and required a separate application and premium. “We did get approved for the maximum limit of $10,000,000,” Gilmore said, adding that the district’s historical coverage was reduced compared with past years and carried an unexpected cost.

Why it matters: rising premiums will affect the district’s operating costs for the coming year and staff said they will pursue safety and risk-management steps intended to reduce future workers’ compensation costs. Gilmore said the district’s workers’ compensation modification factor is 1.16, “so we’re paying 16% more, essentially, in workers’ comp fees than we should,” and that the district will host a risk-management review in August to address employee safety.

Board members also heard one piece of good news: Gilmore said the district negotiated a larger excess earthquake/flood layer — increasing a DIC (difference-in-conditions) limit from $15 million to $20 million — and that premium for that particular policy was reduced by about $40,000.

Discussion and direction: board members asked questions about what drives the increase and about planned mitigation. Staff said the district will emphasize employee-safety trainings and follow the risk-management team’s recommendations to try to lower claims in future years. The board voted to approve the coverage as presented; the motion passed and the coverage was adopted during the meeting.

Next steps: staff will implement the agreed risk-management activities and report back as premium impacts are tracked during the year.