Plano commission tables Coit Marketplace rezoning to Sept. 15 to fix zoning exhibit

5676834 · August 19, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Sign Up Free
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Planning & Zoning Commission accepted a request to table a rezoning petition for land along State Highway 121 after staff said a zoning exhibit left part of the regional employment district outside the requested boundary.

The City of Plano Planning and Zoning Commission voted Aug. 18 to table a rezoning request for five acres along State Highway 121 to the Sept. 15 Planning & Zoning meeting so the applicant could correct a zoning exhibit and mailing notice.

Molly Coriel, interim lead planner, told commissioners the petitioner asked for the delay because the zoning exhibit had inadvertently left a portion of the regional employment zoning district outside the area included in the rezoning request. Coriel said the applicant has updated the zoning exhibit and land records confirmed alignment with district boundaries; the notice to affected properties was being prepared and would be mailed by Friday.

The rezoning request, filed by Coit Marketplace LP, sought to change 5 acres from Regional Employment to Regional Commercial within the State Highway 121 and expressway corridor overlay districts. Coriel said the primary substantive difference between those districts is the allowed uses: Regional Employment targets office and employment‑driven uses while Regional Commercial allows a broader range of retail uses. She said the applicant had not yet submitted concrete plans but hoped to allow retail uses in parcels the developer controls.

Commissioner Bronski moved to table zoning case 2025‑009 to the Sept. 15 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting; Commissioner Langenfelder seconded and the commission recorded the motion as passing 8–0.

Staff indicated the applicant had already corrected the zoning exhibit and that Sept. 15 was an achievable date to re‑notice and re‑hear the case.