Planning staff supports most retaining-wall and accessory-structure waivers but opposes requested front-yard wall height increase
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
Planning staff recommended approval of several waiver requests for accessory‑structure separations and retaining walls but opposed an increase to front‑yard wall height; for one property staff and the town board recommended denial of a 9‑foot block‑wall request where 6 feet is normally allowed.
Clark County planning staff presented several waiver requests for retaining walls and accessory structures and recommended approval of most separation/setback waivers while opposing increases in front‑yard wall height.
Staff summarized two retaining-wall waivers (WS250442, WS250443) for single‑family development at Aquendo and Pioneer and said both planning staff and the Spring Valley Town Board recommended approval; staff reported mixed public responses (support and protest cards). For a separate single‑family parcel (WS250436), staff said it supports waiver requests 1 and 2 — separations and setback waivers for accessory structures such as chicken coops and animal pens in an RS‑20 zoned property — but does not support an increase to the permitted front‑yard wall height. The town board followed staff’s recommendation on that item. Planning staff noted the accessory structures are existing and recommended a one‑year timeframe for completing building permits and inspections; an advisory statement in the backup that said “within 2 years” will be removed to avoid contradiction.
For another single‑family property (WS250441) on Palmyra in Redwood, the applicant seeks block walls up to 9 feet in side and rear yards; staff and the town board recommended denial. Staff read the record counts: for this item they recorded six cards in support and two in protest.
Key numeric clarifications: planning staff said the county code allows a maximum block wall of 6 feet in these zones and that one application requested 9 feet for side/rear yards. Staff will remove a contradictory advisory phrase and give applicants one year to complete permitting and inspections for existing accessory structures where waivers are approved.
No formal planning-commission vote occurred at the briefing; the items will proceed to the public hearing. Commissioners were advised of the staff and town-board recommendations and the counts of support/protest cards for each waiver application.