Board member presents lower‑cost metal‑building concept for aquatic center; staff to compare costs

5739405 · August 25, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A board member presented an alternative concept for an indoor aquatic center using a metal building and a smaller footprint, estimating roughly $4.5 million including $450,000 already spent on design; staff will compare that concept to the existing plan and provide cost comparisons and geotechnical next steps.

PUEBLO WEST, Colo. — A board member presented Aug. 25 a concept to build an indoor aquatic center using a pre‑manufactured metal building to reduce construction cost from prior estimates. The presenter said this concept — an 11,900‑square‑foot metal building containing a 42-by-84 pool and locker rooms — could deliver an indoor pool for about $4.5 million, leaving funding to support other park projects.

The presenter described the package as a verified building quote with subcontractor input gathered over three weeks, and said the estimate includes a 15% contingency and the approximately $450,000 already spent on architectural design. “This is proposed on a metal building... It comes to $4,500,230. And if you see at the bottom, it's, that if we're working with 9,000,000, that leaves approximately 4,500,000 that we could do something else,” the presenter said.

Why it matters: the district previously has considered an $8.9 million design for an aquatic center; a materially cheaper option could allow an indoor facility to be built sooner or free funds for other recreation projects, but would require site selection, soil/geotechnical work and finalized construction documents.

Staff and board members discussed costs for HVAC, humidification and IT that could vary; the presenter identified shell cost, framing and pool vendor quotes and said HVAC was the most uncertain estimate. Board members asked about soil testing and procurement steps; staff said geotechnical investigations are pending and recommended staff get competitive quotes for soils work and confirm whether the current design contract has already started that work.

Ending: staff agreed to compare the metal‑building concept to the existing design and to pursue soil-sampling cost comparisons so the board can evaluate alternate approaches before final design decisions.