This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
Representative Julie Darling (House District 84) presented a bill the committee identified as House Bill 455 to change the Commissioner of Political Practices (COPP) certification deadline for municipal candidates. The sponsor asked the committee to adopt an amendment that moves the COPP certification/notification date so local election offices receive certifications earlier.
“...we changed it to municipal general election and then provide notification no later than 5 days after the candidate filing date,” Representative Julie Darling told the committee while introducing the amendment and asking the committee to consider it in executive action.
County elections supervisors and county clerks who administer ballots described practical problems with the previously proposed certification date. Connor Fitzpatrick, Lewis and Clark County elections division supervisor, said large counties — Gallatin among them — had warned that a September 30 certification date was too late to allow for ballot printing and mailing. Fitzpatrick recommended moving the certification date earlier (the amendment shifted the target from about September 30 to September 24) so counties have the time necessary to finalize ballots and avoid reprints.
Kim Truejill and Deborah Belford from the Commissioner of Political Practices’ office attended as informational witnesses and made staff available for questions. No opponents testified in person or online during the committee hearing. Representative Darling closed by asking the committee to concur in the bill with the proposed amendment.
The committee recording shows proponents from county elections offices and the COPP staff supporting the amendment as a practical measure to synchronize municipal candidate certification with local ballot-printing schedules. The committee closed the hearing with the sponsor’s request for concurrence with the amendment.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and
federal meetings
Real-time civic alerts and notifications
Access transcripts, exports, and saved lists
Premium newsletter with trusted coverage
Why Join Today
Stay Informed
Search every word in city, county, state, and federal meetings.
Real-time alerts. Transcripts, exports, and saved lists.
Exclusive Insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable
briefings tailored to your community.
Shape the Future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through
your engagement and feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions
asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Not Ready Yet?
Explore Citizen Portal for free. Read articles, watch selected videos, and experience
transparency in action—no credit card required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund in 30 days if not a fit