This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
Lawmakers at the March 28 joint hearing pressed regulators and PJM for tools to prevent speculative large‑load projects from inflating demand forecasts and contributing to higher capacity prices.
The problem described: PJM and New Jersey officials said a surge of large‑load entries in interconnection and distribution queues—many tied to proposed data centers and AI facilities—has materially changed load projections for the region. Committee members asked for more public transparency and suggested state gating mechanisms so only projects with demonstrated financial commitment and firm buying contracts feed into statewide and PJM forecasts.
Options discussed
- Financial gating and proof of commercial commitment: Asim Haq (PJM) and several state witnesses identified examples in Ohio and Indiana where states require deposits or firm off‑take agreements for large new loads before those projects appear in official forecasts. - Colocation and transmission treatment: Witnesses noted that data centers collocated behind generator meters may avoid transmission charges and remove generation capacity from the market; the hearing asked FERC, PJM and BPU to clarify treatment of behind‑the‑meter large loads. - Demand‑response and hedging: PJM and experts stressed demand‑response programs and procurement hedges as near‑term tools to blunt price volatility while longer‑term supply is developed.
Why legislators pressed the point
Several members said they need stronger rules to avoid “phantom demand” that can produce auction price signals and lead to preemptive rate increases. They asked the state to consider legislative gating rules or require larger developers to post deposits or demonstrate long‑term customer contracts before their load is treated as firm in forecasting models.
Bottom line
Multiple experts at the hearing urged cross‑state cooperation: because PJM is a multi‑state grid, forecasting and gating policies will be more effective if adopted regionally rather than by a single state. Lawmakers said they would examine state‑level gating measures and ask BPU and Rate Counsel to model potential benefits.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,172 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles, watch selected videos, and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund in 30 days if not a fit