This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
Superintendent Dr. Griffin told the Humboldt Unified School District board that a February "Dear Colleague" letter from the U.S. Department of Education's civil rights division prompted a district review of curriculum and hiring practices to ensure compliance with federal guidance.
Why it matters: The guidance does not create new law but instructs districts about interpretation and application of existing civil-rights regulations, which in turn affected the board's conversation about whether district policy should specifically prohibit certain controversial instructional content or language.
Board member Dr. Dillinger read model policy language derived from a Paradise Valley template that lists concepts staff may not make part of curriculum (language that, if adopted, would prohibit presenting assertions that an individual is inherently morally or intellectually superior based on race or that individuals should feel guilt or psychological distress because of race). Dillinger said she believed the district already adheres to these principles but recommended adding explicit language.
The board debated whether to revise policy BA (goals/strategies language) and whether the district should adopt the broader proposed prohibitions. Trustees agreed to accept a slate of ASBA-recommended policy updates while pulling policy BA for more discussion. The motion to remove BA for separate review and accept the other policy changes passed.
Superintendent Griffin said the district's curriculum team and HR would continue reviewing materials and hiring practices for compliance; the board asked staff to return with recommended wording and more detailed policy options.
Clarifying details: The board did not adopt the specific Paradise Valley language during the meeting; the direction was to examine policy BA and consider incorporating tighter language to make expectations explicit rather than relying on general practice.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and
federal meetings
Real-time civic alerts and notifications
Access transcripts, exports, and saved lists
Premium newsletter with trusted coverage
Why Join Today
Stay Informed
Search every word in city, county, state, and federal meetings.
Real-time alerts. Transcripts, exports, and saved lists.
Exclusive Insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable
briefings tailored to your community.
Shape the Future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through
your engagement and feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions
asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Not Ready Yet?
Explore Citizen Portal for free. Read articles, watch selected videos, and experience
transparency in action—no credit card required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund in 30 days if not a fit