Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Municipal League-backed bill to streamline abatement and foreclosure of dilapidated property draws legal questions in committee

March 31, 2025 | REVENUE & TAX - SENATE, Senate, Committees, Legislative, Arkansas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Municipal League-backed bill to streamline abatement and foreclosure of dilapidated property draws legal questions in committee
House Bill 1695, brought to the Revenue & Tax Committee by John Wilkerson of the Arkansas Municipal League, would reorganize and clarify municipal authority to abate and lien dilapidated, unsafe or unsanitary properties and establish a clearer foreclosure process to help cities return neglected properties to productive use.

Wilkerson told the committee the bill does not create a new municipal power but reorganizes existing language so abatement and lien procedures operate cleanly together. He said the measure extends the time for municipalities to complete required lien processing from 120 days to 365 days, requires recording that a lien has been satisfied, and inserts a foreclosure process that the witness said previously was described in law but lacked an integrated procedure.

"The big addition in this bill is the foreclosure process," Wilkerson said, describing efforts to create a "clean foreclosure process" to achieve clear title and recover costs for raising buildings or cleaning up property. He said the draft borrows procedures from other parts of law and allows municipalities to notify the state land commissioner about repeatedly neglected properties.

Committee members raised a range of concerns. Several senators questioned whether relocating or rephrasing long-standing language (including terms such as "unsightly") could invite new litigation or alter how courts interpret nuisance law. Senator Boyd and Senator Dismang pressed whether moving and replacing sections would change the long-standing Supreme Court precedent that requires a nuisance showing before a municipality may abate property.

Wilkerson and supporters replied that the bill retains the nuisance requirement and due-process protections and that the statutory edits are intended to clarify timing and recording steps rather than broaden municipal authority. On procedural disposition, the committee did not record a successful motion to pass the bill; the transcript shows committee discussion and stops when members indicated a motion would not be made, and no committee passage was announced.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Arkansas articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI