Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Senate bill would restrict use of I&S tax revenues to debt servicing, sponsor says

April 08, 2025 | Committee on Education, Senate, Legislative, Texas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Senate bill would restrict use of I&S tax revenues to debt servicing, sponsor says
Senator Adam Hinojosa presented Senate Bill 16 36 to clarify that interest and sinking (I&S) tax revenues — the portion of local property taxes dedicated to debt service — should be used exclusively for servicing bond debt and not for deferred maintenance or other operational costs.

Hinojosa told the committee I&S revenues are intended to service debt for voter-approved capital projects and that allowing those dollars to be repurposed for deferred maintenance or operational items can undermine long-term fiscal integrity for capital projects. “SB 16 36 aims to ensure that I&S tax revenues are used exclusively for their intended purpose, servicing debt associated with capital projects,” he said.

Witnesses representing school districts raised concerns about the bill’s current drafting. Kimberly Smith, chief finance and strategy officer for Frisco ISD, testified as a resource witness and warned the bill’s wording could prevent districts from using bond proceeds to pay for necessary deferred maintenance projects. Smith described a recent high-school maintenance project that would have cost about $12 million and said shifting such work into operating budgets would reduce funds for salaries and classroom positions. “Preventing school districts from using bond money to pay for these projects would be detrimental to our operating budgets,” she told the committee.

Senators on the committee urged Hinojosa to work with district officials, consultants and fellow senators on a workable definition of “deferred maintenance” and to refine the bill’s language. The committee took public testimony and left SB 16 36 pending for further drafting and stakeholder work.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Texas articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI