Appropriations panel recommends do-not-pass on $5 million rural endowment bill

2964048 · April 11, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee recommended a do-not-pass on Senate Bill 1997, an endowment fund proposal for rural development, and signaled preference for the regional-council approach in SB 2390.

The House Appropriations Committee voted to recommend a do-not-pass on Senate Bill 1997, which would have established a $5 million rural endowment fund, after concluding the regional-council-administered alternative (Senate Bill 2390) was the preferable vehicle for supporting small communities.

Representative Nelson moved a do-not-pass on SB 1997; the committee adopted the motion on a recorded roll call (vote recorded in the transcript as 22 yes, 0 no and 1 absent). Committee discussion noted that many small communities already have local foundations and that a regional-council program could leverage existing staff and governance to deliver grants more effectively.

Members said the endowment model likely would not generate meaningful annual payouts in the near term and would require building administrative capacity. Instead, several members recommended one-time grant funding administered by regional councils to expedite assistance to rural towns, preserve or reopen grocery stores and support local projects.

Representative Nelson agreed to carry SB 1997 with a do-not-pass position and said the committee may position it in conference with the other rural-development bill depending on floor action.