Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Lakeland board denies extra hearing, affirms disciplinary authority decision in Genovese case

April 15, 2025 | Lakeland, School Districts, Tennessee


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Lakeland board denies extra hearing, affirms disciplinary authority decision in Genovese case
The Lakeland Board of Education voted to deny a request for an additional hearing on the disciplinary hearing authority (DHA) decision involving Leo Genovese and then voted to affirm the DHA’s findings at its April business meeting.

The board reviewed video and accompanying documentation from the DHA and discussed whether to grant a second hearing. "This item concerns the disciplinary hearing authority decision of 03/14/2025, which involved Leo Genovese," Dr. Horrell, the district superintendent, told the board before motions were made. After a motion to deny an additional hearing was moved and seconded, the board approved the motion by voice vote. The board then considered whether to affirm, overturn or modify the DHA decision and voted to affirm the DHA findings.

Why it matters: An appeal to the board is a standard step after a DHA ruling; the board’s decisions on process (whether to grant an additional hearing) and on the underlying findings determine whether the DHA ruling remains the district’s final disciplinary outcome.

Board procedure and record: Dr. Horrell explained the two-step decision the board faced: first whether to grant or deny an additional hearing, and second whether to affirm, overturn or modify the DHA decision based on the video and documents the board had reviewed. The motions were made from the floor, seconded, and carried by voice votes; the transcript records the board approving both the denial of an additional hearing and the affirmation of the DHA findings. The transcript does not record individual roll-call tallies for these votes.

Votes at a glance:
• Motion to deny a hearing on the DHA decision concerning Leo Genovese — moved, seconded, approved by voice vote (tally not specified in the record).
• Motion to affirm the findings of the DHA in the Leo Genovese matter — moved, seconded, approved by voice vote (tally not specified in the record).

Next steps: With the board’s affirmation, the DHA decision stands unless further lawful appeal options are pursued outside the board process. The board recorded the actions during its April business meeting and moved on to other agenda items.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Tennessee articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI