Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Committee hears contractor testimony on building-integrated photovoltaics bill; sponsor says it clarifies installation requirements

April 15, 2025 | Committee on Business & Commerce, Senate, Legislative, Texas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee hears contractor testimony on building-integrated photovoltaics bill; sponsor says it clarifies installation requirements
Senator Creighton presented Senate Bill 28 64, which aims to clarify how the state and local permitting authorities regulate building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) — roofing materials that serve as weatherproof roofing while also generating electricity. The sponsor said some localities have been treating BIPV the same as rack-mounted, electrically connected solar arrays, requiring an electrician to be on-site during roofing installation. The bill would allow licensed roofing contractors to install BIPV roofing materials as roofing work, while licensed electricians would remain responsible for wiring and electrical connections.

Ty Smith, a roofing contractor who said he lives in El Paso and has worked as a roofer for 20 years, testified in support. Smith told the committee that in some cities roofing contractors have faced fines or permitting delays when installing BIPV products because local permitting treated the material as electrical work. He said that roofing contractors are installing the watertight roofing surface and that electricians should be responsible for the electrical hookup later. Smith also said adopting the bill would speed recovery after storms and reduce costs. Smith offered a physical sample and said the product he cited is produced in Georgetown, Texas.

Sponsor and members asked staff and witnesses clarifying questions about permitting and safety; no formal vote was recorded during the hearing and the bill was left pending.

Ending: The committee closed public testimony for SB 28 64 and left the measure pending for further consideration.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Texas articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI