Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Bill would create expedited administrative remedy for fraudulent UCC filings; industry and lenders discussed safeguards

April 15, 2025 | Committee on Business & Commerce, Senate, Legislative, Texas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Bill would create expedited administrative remedy for fraudulent UCC filings; industry and lenders discussed safeguards
Senator Parker introduced Senate Bill 22 21, a measure to expand remedies for victims of fraudulent or forged financing statements under the Uniform Commercial Code. The committee considered a substitute that incorporated secretary-of-state language.

Sponsor explanation: The bill raises statutory-minimum damages for wrongful filings and clarifies that anyone harmed by a fraudulent filing — not just property owners — can seek restitution. It permits an injured person to file an affidavit of impermissibility with the secretary of state asking for a prompt administrative termination statement; the secretary-of-state office would notify secured parties and the agency would file a termination statement quickly while preserving secured parties’ due-process rights to contest an improper termination via expedited court procedures. The substitute exempts federally or state-regulated financial institutions from the affidavit process to reduce inappropriate challenges to legitimate filings and authorizes a filing fee to cover administrative costs.

Industry testimony included Ryan Fowler of GM Financial (corporate counsel) who supported the bill’s goal of reducing costly, time-consuming litigation for victims of fraudulent filings and said the current sole remedy — bringing suit — often costs $5,000–$10,000 and takes months. The secretary-of-state’s office was present as a resource and the committee adopted a committee substitute to reflect administration input.

The committee left the bill pending for further consideration.

Ending: Committee took testimony from creditors and consumer advocates, discussed due-process safeguards and administrative fee structures, and left SB 22 21 pending for subsequent drafting.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Texas articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI