Appropriations committee removes $10 million earmark, advances $15 million ag diversification appropriation

2994963 · April 15, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House Appropriations Committee struck a sentence that would have reserved up to $10 million for political subdivisions from a $15 million General Fund request for the Agricultural Diversification and Development Fund and voted the bill out as amended.

The House Appropriations Committee on Wednesday amended and advanced House Bill 02/1927, a request for $15,000,000 from the General Fund to replenish the Agricultural Diversification and Development Fund.

The committee struck language that had specified "of the $15,000,000 up to $10,000,000 is available for agricultural infrastructure grants to political subdivisions," giving the program broader spending flexibility, and then voted to give the bill a "do pass" recommendation as amended.

The bill sponsor told the committee the $15 million is intended to replace monies expended during the current biennium for grants and low-interest loans. A staff summary and discussion noted the bill largely continues an existing program; section 2 of the bill sets the membership of the advisory committee. Representative Brandenburg moved to remove the earmark language; Representative Munson seconded the motion. The committee reported the amendment passed (22–0–1) and later advanced the amended bill out of committee (do pass; 20–2–1).

Representative Bosch asked whether the committee had received testimony that past recipients included out-of-state entities or projects receiving tax abatements. Committee members said they had not received documentation of such complaints during committee testimony and that it might relate to a particular past project; members agreed to follow up if more information was requested.

With the amendment, the bill proceeds to the floor with the committee recommending passage.

Votes at a glance: the amendment to remove the earmark passed 22–0–1; the do-pass motion on the bill as amended passed 20–2–1.

The committee named a carry (to return the bill to the originating Ag Committee) and identified Representative Belts as the carrier to the floor.