Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Training center contract, gun range and asbestos concerns remain under review

August 18, 2025 | Victoria County, Texas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Training center contract, gun range and asbestos concerns remain under review
County staff told the Victoria County Commissioners Court they have identified a low bidder on the Regional Public Safety Training Center and accepted the base bid plus two alternate bids for building construction, but an executed contract had not been received at the time of the workshop. Commissioners discussed follow-on site work and requested a plan for asbestos removal for future finish-outs.

Why it matters: the training center is a multi‑phase county facility intended to host law‑enforcement and public‑safety training; completing the building and adjacent site work (parking, septic, fencing, later a gun range and metal storage buildings) is a recurring court priority.

Contract status and budget
John (staff member) said the court had selected the base bid and alternate 1 and 2 for the building; staff were still awaiting the executed contract from Logger (the apparent low bidder). He gave a working building total of about $2.1 million for the accepted base bid and alternates; sitework (pavement, fencing, grading, septic) remains a separate cost to be contracted later.

Asbestos removal and future finish-out
Carrie (staff member) told the court she wants the asbestos survey and remediation for areas not currently in the project scope either added as a future phase or incorporated into the contractor’s contract to avoid future re-mobilization and extra cost. Commissioners agreed that remediating asbestos-containing materials in areas that may be finished later would produce future savings and reduce remobilization risk.

Phasing and priorities: gun range and metal buildings
Commissioners pushed to prioritize a gun range and at least one metal storage building in coming phases. John said the court had identified multiple future phases — site fencing and parking (phase 2), the gun range (future phase), metal buildings for storage and SWAT dress‑out areas — and commissioners suggested moving the gun range and one metal building up the priority list because the site remains underused until secure fencing and target areas are completed.

Ending
Staff said they will continue to press for an executed contract and will return with updated cost and remediation options, a recommended sequencing for site work and alternatives for addressing asbestos in areas that may be finished after the building is occupied.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Texas articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI