CRB flags high‑speed MNPD driving; officer accepted written reprimand in pre‑investigative settlement

5834686 · August 26, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

NCRB reviewed case CC2025014 alleging Officer Ruben Mariano exceeded posted speeds up to 93 mph on interstate and out‑of‑county travel. Officer accepted a pre‑investigative settlement for a written reprimand; NCRB recommended stiffer discipline in serious cases and urged clearer application of reckless‑driving standards.

The Nashville Community Review Board reviewed CC2025014, which alleges that an MNPD officer, Ruben Mariano, drove at high speeds — up to 93 mph — during a commute that crossed into Kentucky. Trackstar GPS and a dash‑cam review documented the speeds; the officer entered a pre‑investigative settlement and accepted a category‑E written reprimand for speeding. NCRB members said the recorded speeds and lane changes were dangerous and argued that, when officer conduct creates a risk to public safety at highway speeds, discipline should reflect the potential seriousness of the conduct. Board members noted that a pre‑investigative settlement results in a written reprimand that, in practice, can be less consequential than a formal reckless‑driving charge available under state law. Why it matters: The board said similar past cases of out‑of‑county high‑speed travel produced written reprimands via pre‑investigative settlements, raising questions about consistency and whether serial infractions escalate disciplinary categories. MNPD representatives described the department’s disciplinary grid and retention periods, and said repeat or subsequent offenses within retention windows can increase category and penalties. Board action: The NCRB report was accepted. The assistant director and executive director conferred, and the board voted to forward the accepted report to the chief and the mayor. Members asked MNPD to consider whether conduct that endangers lives should be charged as reckless driving rather than a lesser speeding category in future similar cases.