Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Community members press Arcata council to agendize Palestine: calls for sister city ties and CalPERS divestment

August 07, 2025 | Arcata City, Humboldt County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Community members press Arcata council to agendize Palestine: calls for sister city ties and CalPERS divestment
Multiple residents and organizations asked the Arcata City Council Aug. 6 to place Palestine‑related items on a future council agenda, including a sister‑city relationship with Gaza City and a request for the city to push CalPERS to divest from companies tied to the Israeli military.
At the meeting, speaker after speaker urged the council to take up the issue. "I would like the city council please put on the agenda the request for CalPERS to divest," said Karpani Burns during the public‑comment period. Other commenters called for Arcata to adopt a sister‑city tie with Gaza City and to launch local divestment measures: "Please divest from CalPERS," one speaker said, and another urged, "Let's make Gaza City a sister city."
Supporters argued the requests were morally urgent and tied to the use of U.S. tax dollars and public investment. Several speakers linked local investment policies and the city's social responsibility clause to calls for divestment; one attendee cited an Arcata resolution (Resolution 245‑19) and asked why the city’s policy had not been enforced.
Opponents and some members of the public urged caution. In the meeting and on Zoom, speakers warned that sister‑city relationships typically require shared civic values such as democracy and human‑rights protections and argued that Gaza City, governed by Hamas, did not meet those criteria. One Zoom speaker said, "Gaza under Hamas has none of those" (elections, free press, LGBTQ+ rights). Another speaker on Zoom urged the council to avoid mixing local government business with foreign policy.
No council motion to agendize a sister city or to request CalPERS action appears in the Aug. 6 transcript; the requests were made by members of the public and several community groups. Several commenters said they would continue to push the council for formal consideration, and some asked the council to use its investment‑policy clause to review connections to CalPERS holdings.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal